Search Results for "arbitrary discretionary power"

760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of E-Ticketing Contract, Directs Parties to Arbitration. Contractual disputes involving disputed questions of fact are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India when an arbitration clause exists.

The Petitioner, a Private Limited Company, challenged the termination notice dated 13.06.2024 issued by the Respondent No.2 – Aurangabad Smart City ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction on Public Drain by Thane Municipal Corporation Commissioner. Commissioner's Order Under MRTP Act and MMC Act Held Arbitrary and Ultra Vires as Construction Obstructed Water Course and Was Not for Genuine Access.

The case involves a writ petition filed by residents of Tarangan Housing Complex, Thane, challenging a regularisation order dated 05 February 2005 iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Enquiry Officer's Report Not Furnished to Contractor Before Imposing Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by Respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.

Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Stay of Cancellation of Letter of Award in Tender Dispute. Court holds that disputes arising from pre-contractual stage are not arbitrable and interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when no arbitration agreement exists.

The Petitioner, Provident Multi-Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...