Bombay High Court Quashes Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction on Public Drain by Thane Municipal Corporation Commissioner. Commissioner's Order Under MRTP Act and MMC Act Held Arbitrary and Ultra Vires as Construction Obstructed Water Course and Was Not for Genuine Access.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3637
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a writ petition filed by residents of Tarangan Housing Complex, Thane, challenging a regularisation order dated 05 February 2005 issued by the Commissioner of Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC). The order regularised an unauthorised construction built by the third respondent, a builder/developer, on a public Nallah/drain. The petitioners argued that the construction was patently illegal, obstructed the water course, and was made to divert attention from the fact that the third respondent had blocked the existing access to the housing complex. The TMC had earlier filed a reply before the Civil Court opposing the construction, but later the Commissioner regularised it. The petitioners contended that the regularisation was arbitrary, ultra vires the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act), the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 (MMC Act), and the Development Control Regulations of TMC (DCR of TMC). They argued that the Commissioner had no power to regularise such construction and that the reliance on Section 45 of MRTP Act, Section 227 of MMC Act, and Regulation 47 of DCR of TMC was misplaced. The TMC defended the order, submitting that the power to regularise exists under Section 53(3) of MRTP Act and Section 227(1)(b) of MMC Act, and that the construction provided access to the housing complex. The third respondent argued that the construction was permitted in the initial plans and that the Commissioner had ample powers to regularise. The court, after hearing the parties, found that the regularisation order was patently arbitrary and ultra vires. The court noted that the construction was on a public drain, obstructed the water course, and was not for genuine access. The Commissioner's exercise of power was based on legal malafides, as the TMC had earlier opposed the construction. The court held that the provisions relied upon were not attracted to the facts of the case. The court quashed the regularisation order and directed the TMC to take appropriate action to remove the unauthorised construction and restore the Nallah/drain to its original condition.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction - Ultra Vires - The Commissioner of Thane Municipal Corporation regularised a construction built on a public Nallah/drain by the third respondent builder/developer. The court held that the regularisation order was patently arbitrary and ultra vires the provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, and Development Control Regulations of Thane Municipal Corporation. The construction obstructed the water course and was not for genuine access. (Paras 2-9, 18-20)

B) Municipal Law - Legal Malafides - Abuse of Power - The court found that the Commissioner's order was based on legal malafides, as the TMC had earlier filed a reply before the Civil Court opposing the construction, but later regularised it. The Commissioner relied on provisions not attracted to the facts, such as Section 45 of MRTP Act and Section 227 of MMC Act, to regularise the unauthorised structure. (Paras 6-7, 18-20)

C) Town Planning - Regularisation under Section 53(3) MRTP Act - Not Applicable - The court noted that the power under Section 53(3) of MRTP Act cannot be used to regularise a construction that is patently illegal and on public property. The regularisation order was based on a misconception of law. (Paras 10, 15, 18-20)

D) Municipal Law - Access over Street - Section 227 MMC Act - Misapplication - The Commissioner's reliance on Section 227(1)(b) of MMC Act to regularise a connecting passage over a street was misplaced, as the construction was on a Nallah/drain, not a street, and obstructed the water course. (Paras 11, 18-20)

E) Development Control - Regulation 47 DCR of TMC - Landlocked Plot - The court held that Regulation 47 of DCR of TMC, which deals with access to landlocked plots, was not applicable as the subject plot was not landlocked. The third respondent had blocked existing access and then sought regularisation. (Paras 8, 12, 18-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Commissioner of Thane Municipal Corporation had the power to regularise a patently unauthorised construction built on a public Nallah/drain, and whether the impugned regularisation order dated 05 February 2005 was arbitrary and ultra vires the provisions of the MRTP Act, MMC Act, and DCR of TMC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned regularisation order dated 05 February 2005. The court directed the Thane Municipal Corporation to take appropriate action to remove the unauthorised construction and restore the Nallah/drain to its original condition.

Law Points

  • Regularisation of unauthorised construction on public drain is ultra vires MRTP Act and MMC Act
  • Legal malafides vitiate administrative orders
  • Power under Section 45 MRTP Act cannot be used to regularise construction on municipal property
  • Section 227 MMC Act does not permit regularisation of construction obstructing water course
  • Regulation 47 DCR of TMC not applicable when plot not landlocked
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (10) 74

WRIT PETITION NO. 3351 OF 2005

2024-10-07

M. S. Sonak, Kamal Khata

Mr Amol P. Mhatre (for petitioners), Mr Yash Dewal (for applicant in CAW/751/2014), Ms Rupali Shinde (AGP for State), Dr Milind Sathe (Senior Advocate for TMC), Mr Girish Godbole (Senior Advocate for respondent no.3)

Mr. Natvar T. Patel and others

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the regularisation order of unauthorised construction on a public Nallah/drain by the Thane Municipal Corporation Commissioner.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners, residents of Tarangan Housing Complex, sought quashing of the regularisation order dated 05 February 2005 and directions to remove the unauthorised construction.

Filing Reason

The petitioners alleged that the Commissioner of TMC illegally regularised a patently unauthorised construction built by the third respondent on a public Nallah/drain, obstructing the water course and blocking existing access to the housing complex.

Previous Decisions

The TMC had earlier filed a reply before the Civil Court opposing the construction, but later the Commissioner regularised it. The Executive Engineer communicated the regularisation order.

Issues

Whether the Commissioner of Thane Municipal Corporation had the power to regularise a patently unauthorised construction built on a public Nallah/drain. Whether the impugned regularisation order dated 05 February 2005 was arbitrary and ultra vires the provisions of the MRTP Act, MMC Act, and DCR of TMC. Whether the regularisation order was vitiated by legal malafides.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: The regularisation order is patently arbitrary and ultra vires the MRTP Act, MMC Act, and DCR of TMC. The construction is on a public drain, obstructs water course, and was made to divert attention from the third respondent blocking existing access. The Commissioner abused his powers and acted with legal malafides. TMC: The power to regularise exists under Section 53(3) of MRTP Act read with Sections 44, 45, and 53. The order was made under Section 227(1)(b) of MMC Act as the plot abutted a street. The plot was landlocked, so Regulation 47 of DCR of TMC was also invoked. Third Respondent: The construction was permitted in initial plans. The Commissioner has ample powers to regularise under Sections 45 and 53(3) of MRTP Act read with MMC Act. The petitioners are disgruntled members; majority of the housing complex supports the access.

Ratio Decidendi

The Commissioner of Thane Municipal Corporation has no power to regularise a patently unauthorised construction built on a public Nallah/drain, as such regularisation is ultra vires the MRTP Act, MMC Act, and DCR of TMC. The exercise of power under Section 45 of MRTP Act and Section 227 of MMC Act was misconceived and based on legal malafides. The construction obstructed the water course and was not for genuine access. Regularisation cannot be granted for a structure that is patently illegal and on public property.

Judgment Excerpts

This Petition shows the extent to which the Commissioner of Thane Municipal Corporation has gone to help the third Respondent, a builder/developer and a mall owner by way of regularising a patently unauthorised construction put up by the third Respondent on a public Nallah/drain. The impugned regularization order is patently arbitrary and ultra vires the provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, and the Development Control Regulations of Thane Municipal Corporation. The Commissioner's purported exercise of powers under Section 45 of the MRTP Act, read with Section 227 of the MMC Act, was misconceived.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2005 challenging the regularisation order dated 05 February 2005. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 27 September 2024, pronouncing it on 07 October 2024. A civil application (CAW/751/2014) was also filed by M/s. Tarangan Towers CHS Ltd. seeking intervention, which was considered.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 44, Section 45, Section 53, Section 53(3)
  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949: Section 227, Section 227(1)(b)
  • Development Control Regulations of Thane Municipal Corporation: Regulation 47, Regulation 47(7)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Caste Scrutiny Committee to Decide Caste Claim Within Six Months and Protects Petitioner's Services. The court ordered that the petitioner's services be protected pending the decision of the Caste Scrutiny Committee on his c...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Victim's Father in Acquittal Case — Remands for Retrial Due to Non-Compliance with Section 313 CrPC. Failure to Put Incriminating Circumstances to Accused and Non-Examination of Key Witnesses Renders Trial Unfair.