Search Results for "acquisition lapse"

685 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 685 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Declares Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. Award Excluding Subject Lands and Subsequent Inaction for Over Two Decades Leads to Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Laxman Mahadev Katkar, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Urban Improvement Trust's Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Upheld Despite Delay and Compensation Disputes. Notification under Section 52(1) of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 Valid; Compensation Determined and Paid Lawfully.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Urban Improvement Trust against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had quashed the land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award Due to Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Proceedings Deemed Lapsed as Award Was Not Made Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration.

The petitioner, Haribhau Narayan Chikane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Appellants' challenge to 1965 acquisition notification filed in 1992 held time-barred under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 and earlier writ petition dismissal operates as res judicata.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in 1992 seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of two suit properties bear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Legality of Land Acquisition for Jaipur Metro Rail Phase II, Focusing on Compliance with Section 5A Hearing. The Court Examined Whether Denial of Personal Hearing to Landowners Vitiates Acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals by landowners challenging a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that reversed a Single Judge's o...