Search Results for "Writ Petitions"

7344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds PMC's Demolition Notices for Illegal Green Belt Constructions in Pune. Petitioners' Plea for Regularization Rejected; Costs Imposed for Violations of Environmental Regulations

The petitioners challenge the demolition notices issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) for illegal structures built in the green belt zone on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court's Rs. 50 Lakh Cost and CBI Probe in Habeas Corpus Case Involving Allegations of Illegal Detention and Political Mudslinging. High Court Had Found the Petition an Abuse of Process, Imposed Costs, and Directed CBI Investigation Against the Petitioner.

The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) dated 7 March 2011, dismissing a habeas corpus writ petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SRA Scheme for Lack of Public Interest. Court finds that the petition is not a genuine public interest litigation but is filed to further personal interests of the petitioner.

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Mumbai Division of Maharashtra Machhimar Kruti Samiti, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions on Municipal Ward Reservation; Decision Not Available Due to Incomplete Judgment Text. Petitions challenged notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 reserving wards for certain categories, alleging arbitrariness.

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 issued by the State Go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions Seeking Revival of Land Acquisition References Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. Petitioners failed to appear before the Reference Court for over a decade, leading to dismissal of references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging orders of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Omerga, dismissing their Land Acquisition References (LARs...