Search Results for "Work Assistants"

128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case. Termination of Workmen Without Domestic Enquiry Held Illegal, Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld Under Section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company (GESCOM), a statutory body, employed the respondents as Junior Assistants/Ledger Maintenance. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Apportionment of Liability at 50% Each Between KSRTC Bus and Lorry Driver for Fatal Collision.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimants, legal representatives of deceased D.N. Vijaya Kumar, sought compensation for his deat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Relationship of Employer and Employee Established Between Market Committee and Licensed Weighman.

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Solapur, and its Chairman filed a writ petition challenging a Labour Court award dated 29 November 1997, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...