High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Apportionment of Liability at 50% Each Between KSRTC Bus and Lorry Driver for Fatal Collision.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimants, legal representatives of deceased D.N. Vijaya Kumar, sought compensation for his death in a collision between a KSRTC bus and a lorry. The Tribunal at Kodagu awarded Rs.18,50,000/- with 6% interest, holding the KSRTC bus driver solely negligent. The KSRTC and its insurer appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, contending contributory negligence by the lorry driver. The High Court, after examining the evidence including the complaint and spot panchanama, found that the lorry driver was also negligent as he drove on the wrong side of the road. Consequently, the court apportioned liability equally at 50% each. The compensation was reduced to Rs.9,25,000/- payable by the appellants, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till deposit. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the award accordingly.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - Apportionment of Liability - Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The appeal challenged the Tribunal's award fixing 100% negligence on the KSRTC bus driver. The High Court, on reappreciation of evidence, held that the accident occurred due to negligence of both drivers, as the lorry driver was also negligent in driving on the wrong side. Liability apportioned at 50% each. Compensation reduced proportionately. (Paras 2-6)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Quantum - Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The Tribunal awarded Rs.18,50,000/- with 6% interest. The High Court, after apportioning negligence, reduced the compensation payable by the appellants to 50% of the awarded amount, i.e., Rs.9,25,000/-, with proportionate interest. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal was justified in fixing 100% negligence on the KSRTC bus driver and awarding compensation of Rs.18,50,000/- without considering contributory negligence of the deceased lorry driver.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The judgment and award of the Tribunal is modified. The liability is apportioned at 50% each on the KSRTC bus and the lorry. The appellants are liable to pay 50% of the awarded compensation, i.e., Rs.9,25,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till deposit. The balance 50% shall be paid by the owner and insurer of the lorry.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Apportionment of liability
  • Motor accident compensation
  • Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (12) 28

M.F.A.NO. 1969 OF 2013 (MV)

2013-12-13

N.K. PATIL, BUDIHAL R.B.

Shri. K.Nagaraja for appellants, Shri. S.R. Raviprakash for respondent No.1

K.S.R.T.C. by its Managing Director, K.S.R.T.C., K.H. Road, Bangalore-27 and K.S.R.T.C., Internal Insurance Co., Ltd.

Smt. D.V. Anitha, Master Digvijay, Master Varun, Smt. D.N.Kamini @ Lalitha, Sri. D.P. Ravikumar, The General Manager, HDFC (ERGO) General Insurance Co., Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding compensation for death in road accident.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought reduction of compensation on ground of contributory negligence by deceased lorry driver.

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged the Tribunal's finding of 100% negligence on KSRTC bus driver and quantum of compensation.

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded Rs.18,50,000/- with 6% interest, holding KSRTC bus driver solely negligent.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in fixing 100% negligence on the KSRTC bus driver without considering contributory negligence of the lorry driver. Whether the compensation awarded is excessive.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the accident occurred due to negligence of both drivers, as the lorry driver was driving on the wrong side. Respondents supported the Tribunal's finding of sole negligence on the bus driver.

Ratio Decidendi

In a collision between two vehicles, if both drivers are negligent, liability must be apportioned based on the degree of negligence. The court can reappreciate evidence in appeal under Section 173(1) of MV Act to determine contributory negligence.

Judgment Excerpts

On reappreciation of the oral and documentary evidence, it is clear that the accident occurred due to negligence of both the drivers. The lorry driver was also negligent in driving the lorry on the wrong side of the road. Therefore, we hold that both the drivers are equally responsible for the accident.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kodagu, Madikeri, which awarded compensation on 05/12/2012. KSRTC and its insurer filed appeal under Section 173(1) of MV Act on 13/12/2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Industrial Dispute Over Workman Status Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Classifies Six Categories of Junior Management Staff Not to Be Workmen While Upholding Four Categories as Workmen. Substantial or Ma...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute Due to Erroneous Deduction of Developmental Costs from Agricultural Land. Court Held That Valuation of Large Extent of Agricultural Land on Square Foot Basis is Per Se Illegal an...