Search Results for "Unauthorised occupation"

335 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 335 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Port Trust Against Sub-Tenant — Eviction Order Restored Under Public Premises Act. Sub-tenant cannot claim protection under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act as premises are governed by the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai (a statutory corporation), filed a writ petition challenging an order of the City Civil Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice Under Gujarat Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 2012. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Article 300A of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Kureshi Irfanbhai Mohammadsharifbhai and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition for Playground. Market Value Fixed at Rs. 100 per sq.mtr. Based on Comparable Sale Deed, with Solatium and Interest Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common land acquisition notification for a children's playground in Pimpri-Chinchwad. The land, admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Order in Coastal Zone Management Case — Upholds Finding That Structure Was Constructed Post-1991 Based on Satellite Imagery and Survey Data.

The case involves an appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge dismissing a writ petition challenging a demolition order passed by the Goa Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeals in MHADA Eviction Case — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Appellant's claim for tenancy rights rejected as he failed to prove lawful possession under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from eviction proceedings under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976. The appel...