Search Results for "Tribunals"

2042 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2042 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Partnership Dispute. The Court considered whether to appoint a sole arbitrator for disputes arising from a partnership deed containing multiple arbitration clauses.

The applicants, Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. and Bharat Barrel And Drum Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd., filed two arbitration applications under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging State Circulars on Reservation in Public Services for Lack of Maintainability. Petitioners Must First Approach Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal Under Section 15 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging certain circulars issued by the State Government concerning reservatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses SEBI's Appeal in Securities Market Violation Case Due to Absence of Question of Law. Tribunal's Factual Findings on Advertisements, Manipulation, and Natural Justice Upheld, with Jurisdiction Under Section 15Z of SEBI Act, 1992 Confined to Legal Issues.

The dispute arose from a statutory appeal under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, filed by SEBI against the Securit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers PIL on Infrastructure of Judiciary; Examines Primacy of High Court's Recommendations for Additional Courts. Court Notes State Government's Delays and Insistence That Its Own Views Prevail, Highlighting Need for 867 Additional Courts and Special Courts for Vulnerable Groups.

This public interest litigation was instituted by a chartered accountant, Vihar Durve, raising concerns about the infrastructure of the judiciary in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Examines Constitutional Validity of Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee and Tenure. Advocate and Sitting District Commission Members Challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) Alleging Violation of Separation of Powers and Seeking Re-Appointment Eligibility.

These three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSFC's Petition Challenging DRAT Order Granting Cross-Examination in Loan Recovery Case. Right to Cross-Examine Affidavit Deponent Is a Valuable Right Not Barred by Rule 12(6) of DRT Procedure Rules.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation (MSFC), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challeng...