Search Results for "Town Panchayat election"

138 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification Under Anti-Defection Law. Court's Analysis on Whether Absence from Meeting Amounts to Voluntarily Giving Up Membership Insufficiently Provided in Text.

The petitioner, a member of the Koratagere Town Panchayat elected under a Janatha Dal (Secular) ticket, filed this writ petition under Articles 226 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Constitutional Mandate for Timely Municipal Elections in BBMP. Amendment Act 17 of 2020 struck down as ultra vires Article 243-U of the Constitution.

The case involved a public interest litigation filed by two corporators of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) seeking directions to conduct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notification and Election Notice for Town Panchayat President and Vice-President Posts Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42A of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964. Court holds that provisional notification and public hearing are mandatory before final reservation of posts.

The petitioner, B.N. Srinivas, challenged the legality of a notification dated 13.03.2017 issued by the State of Karnataka and an election notice date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...