Search Results for "Tamil Nadu land records"

323 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 323 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Vacation of Status Quo in Land Encroachment PIL — Government's Inaction Over Six Years Leads to Third-Party Rights

The case originated from a public interest litigation filed by Respondents in the Madras High Court alleging illegal land transactions in Thazham...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Non-Speaking Final Notice Held Valid as No Adjudication Required at Section 6 Stage. Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 10 of the Act.

The petitioners, Karupayee and Thangamani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case for Delay in Possession — Promoter Liable for Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016. The court restored the order of TN RERA directing the promoter to pay interest for delay in handing over possession of flat and club house facilities.

The appellant, a retired General Manager of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on 30.07.2011 with the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation.

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Under Section 10(5) of ULC Act Before Repeal. Application Under Section 21 Was Barred by Limitation, and Repeal Did Not Affect Lands Where Possession Was Already Taken.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The appellants, legal representatives...