Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.

26 Oct 2016

The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

28 Sep 2018

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employee Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as Employer Failed to Produce Muster Rolls to Disprove 240 Days Service.

24 Dec 2013

The State of Maharashtra, through the Executive Engineer, Ahmednagar Irrigation Division, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and award dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation in Labour Dispute, Upholds Industrial Court Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of Workman Without Compliance of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, After Completion of 240 Days of Service, Held Illegal.

5 Mar 2020

The Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation (petitioner) challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Jalgaon, which directed reinstatement of the wor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards in Industrial Dispute Cases. Workmen Held Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Back Wages as Per Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

31 Oct 2014

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra (through the Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, and other officers) ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Retrenchment Dispute. Retrenchment of 12 Liftmen Held Illegal as Management Failed to Prove Abandonment of Service and Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

24 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Welcomgroup Searock, which manages the Searock Hotel in Bandra, Mumbai, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 15th Febr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Unfair Termination of Temporary Employee. Termination of a peon appointed on compassionate basis held invalid, but compensation of Rs.25,000 deemed adequate given short service and nature of appointment.

16 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Sandip Pandurang Nannaware, was appointed as a peon on 01/01/2002 in place of his father at Shrigonda Krishi Utpana Bazar Samiti. His ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice for Non-Observance of Rule 81 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 and Section 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Custom and Practice of Negotiation with Union Constitutes Condition of Service. The court held that the established custom of negotiation with the union was a condition of service, and its breach, along with non-compliance with the 'last come first go' principle, constituted unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act.

5 May 2006

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Mackinon Mackenzie Ltd. (the appellant/original respondent in the complaint) against the judgment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Zilla Parishad Management Challenging Permanency of Daily Wagers; Grants Reinstatement with Back Wages in Leprosy Eradication Project Terminations. Workers' Continuity of Service Despite Artificial Breaks Entitled Them to Retrenchment Compensation Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Standing Order 4C Deemed Permanency Not Applicable to State Instrumentalities.

17 Oct 2019

The dispute arose from the employment and subsequent termination of daily-wage workers engaged under the Multi Drug Therapy Programme and National Lep...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Workman in Railway Termination Case — Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld. Continuous Service Requirement Under Section 25B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Satisfied Despite Intermittent Breaks.

21 Jun 2005

The appellant, Shri Jairaj N. Shetty, was employed as a Casual Cook in the Catering Section of the Commercial Department, Central Railway, Mumbai V.T....

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)