Search Results for "Section 14(2) maintainability"

323 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 323 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal as Not Maintainable Due to Absence of Tribunal's Permission Under Section 170(b) of Motor Vehicles Act. Appeal Against Quantum of Compensation Fails as Insurer Did Not Obtain Leave to Contest Merits Beyond Statutory Defences.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, dealt with an appeal filed by M/s Shriram General Insurance Company Limited against an aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Hears Criminal Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case. Trial Court Found Cheque Dishonoured but Dismissed Complaint for Lack of Authorization of Power of Attorney Holder Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The present criminal appeal arose from the acquittal of the respondent-accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Interim Compensation Under Section 140 MV Act Cannot Be Kept in Abeyance. Tribunal erred in deferring no-fault liability compensation pending final adjudication of main claim petition.

The appellant, K.L. Vidyashankar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for injuries sustained...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wakf Board's Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Dargah and Graveyard. Court Holds That Wakf Board Can Sue for Declaration and Possession Without Prior Notification Under Section 6 of Wakf Act, 1954, and That Adverse Possession Cannot Be Claimed Against Wakf Property.

The appellant, Maratwada Wakf Board, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment of the fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Delay Condonation Application in Specific Performance Suit — Unexplained Delay of Over 8 Years Not Condonable. Cross-Objection Filed After 3015 Days Without Sufficient Cause Rejected Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The judgment pertains to an application for condonation of delay of 3015 and 3166 days in filing cross-objection in Second Appeals No. 658/2007 and 70...