Search Results for "Sand mining"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Sand mining"

130 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Seeking Extension of Mining Lease Period and Forest Clearance Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The court examines whether deemed extensions up to 31 March 2020 should be further extended due to delay in execution of lease deeds and forest clearances.

19 Mar 2020

The High Court of Karnataka heard two writ petitions together involving common questions of law and fact. Both petitioners held mining leases that had...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Executive Instruction Requiring Environmental Clearance for Quarry Permits Under Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 2013. Petitioners Contend Rule 59 Governs Short-Term Permits and Does Not Mandate Prior Environmental Clearance, Unlike Rule 11(5)(f) for Quarry Leases, and Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Rules.

14 Oct 2022

These three writ petitions were filed before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court by two stone crusher owners' associations and one individual pr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings for Offences Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Police Investigation Without Authorized Complaint Under Section 22 of the Act Rendered Proceedings Void Ab Initio and Allowed Petitions Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dealt with a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by va...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds District Task Force Committee's Power to Cancel Mining Licences for Violations of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994. The court held that the Committee has quasi-judicial authority to revoke quarrying licences for non-compliance with statutory conditions, including illegal transportation and failure to maintain records.

19 Jun 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by several individuals, including Sri S.R. Bellary and Sri A.J. Kalkeri, challenging the reso...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Earth from Metro Project. Excavated earth from underground metro construction not 'minor mineral' under Notification dated 3 February 2000; no royalty payable.

8 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Tata Projects Limited, a member of a consortium executing the Mumbai Metro Underground Project, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under MMDR Act. Petitioner/Accused No.1 Charged Under Section 379 IPC and Sections 21, 22 of MMDR Act for Alleged Theft of Sand – Proceedings Quashed as Cognizance Without Required Sanction Under Section 22 of MMDR Act is Invalid.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri Rudrappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)