Search Results for "Rubber Act 1947"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rubber Act 1947"

125 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders in Service Disputes. Held that the Labour Court and Industrial Court have concurrent jurisdiction under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and that the employer's failure to produce documents justified adverse inference.

1 Sep 2016

The case involves four writ petitions arising from service disputes between the Maharashtra State Khadi and Village Industries Board (the employer) an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Clarified. Labour Court's Order Rejecting Approval for Dismissal Restored as It Did Not Exceed Its Limited Jurisdiction.

16 Oct 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between John D'Souza, a workman, and the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). The workman joined as a b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurance Company's SLP Against NCDRC Order, Holds Remedy Lies Under Article 226/227 Not Article 136. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(a) - National Commission's appellate orders are not subject to Article 136 jurisdiction directly.

1 Jan 2023

The case arises from a consumer dispute where the complainant, Suresh Chand Jain, had obtained a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy and a Burglar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Whether Industrial Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 33(2)(b) Industrial Disputes Act While Rejecting Approval for Dismissal. Tribunal's Findings on Victimisation and Disproportionate Punishment Without Pleadings and Beyond Limited Prima Facie Review Challenged.

10 Mar 2023

The writ petition arose from an industrial dispute where the management of Bata India Limited challenged the order of the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order of Reinstatement of Workman. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that the domestic enquiry was perverse and the punishment of dismissal was disproportionate to the misconduct of threatening behavior and inciting workmen.

28 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited, challenged the final order dated 24th March 2017 passed by the Industrial Court Mumbai...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Sanction Order in Disproportionate Assets Case Against IRS Officer — Sanctioning Authority Failed to Apply Independent Mind and Relied on CBI Report Without Proper Application of Mind.

29 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Vivek Batra, an Indian Revenue Service officer, challenged the sanction order dated 09.10.2012 granted by the Union of India for his p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Approval Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Granted for Acts of Violence on Establishment Premises. The court found no perversity in the Industrial Tribunal's decision to grant approval for dismissal based on chargesheets and a subsequent incident of violence.

28 Sep 2006

This batch of six writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India arises from orders of the Industrial Tribunal granting approval under ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in Customs Smuggling Conspiracy Case — Statements Under Section 171-A of Sea Customs Act Held Admissible as Customs Officer is Not a Court. Office Copy of Insurance Premium Debit Note Admissible Under Section 114 Evidence Act and Appraiser's Valuation Evidence Not Hearsay, Convictions Upheld.

13 Aug 1969

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against convictions by the Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, as affirmed by the Bombay High Court, for conspirac...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)