Search Results for "Reply Statement"

6829 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6829 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Education Service Dispute — Illegal Termination Violates M.E.P.S. Rules. Employee's discontinuation without inquiry and notice held illegal; employer directed to reinstate with back wages and continuity.

The case involves an appeal by an educational institution and its headmaster against a common judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Family Business Dispute. Dispute Centers on Inclusion of Agricultural Lands Held by Individual Family Members in Family Asset Separation Process.

The appeal arose from a family dispute within the Malhotra family of Pune, who owned and controlled several businesses including Weikfield Products Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Seeking Full Backwages in Reinstatement Case. Labour Court's Order of 50% Backwages Upheld as Employer Violated Natural Justice by Dismissing Without Waiting for Reply Period.

The petitioner, Sunil Shamrao Thokal, was employed as a Store Keeper with the respondent, The Salvation Army Evangeline Booth Hospital, since 1989. On...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Performance Licenses for Tamasha Troupes — Violation of Natural Justice. Licenses Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing Under Tamasha Rules, 1960.

The petitioners, Renuka Sanskritik Kala Kendra and Natraj Sanskrutik Kala Kendra, are proprietors of tamasha troupes operating in Moha, Taluka Jamkhed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond Renders Assessment Order a Nullity.

The petitioner, Madhuri Sameer Gokhale, an individual homemaker, challenged the reassessment order dated 29 March 2022 passed by the National Faceless...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order and Notice Under Section 148A(d) and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Proper Application of Mind. Reassessment Initiated Based on Information from Investigation Wing Without Independent Satisfaction by Assessing Officer.

The petitioner, Mr. Sanath Kumar Murali, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnat...