Search Results for "Regular Assessment"

1165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in KVAT Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Assessee Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Third Party. Section 39(1) Reassessment Set Aside as Assessing Authority Relied on Ex-Parte Statements Without Providing Opportunity to Rebut.

The petitioner, M/s. TTP Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a registered company represented by its Director Sri. M. Devarajaiah, filed writ petitions under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Examines Whether Reopening of Assessments Under Section 148 Based on Search Material is Permissible Without Invoking Section 153C. Core Legal Question Involves Overriding Effect of Search-Related Special Provisions Over General Reassessment Provisions Under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The group of Special Civil Applications filed before the High Court of Gujarat challenged the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Change of Opinion. Reassessment Notice and Order Quashed as Assessing Officer Had No Fresh Tangible Material to Justify Reopening.

The petitioner, Aroni Commercials Limited, challenged a notice dated 28 March 2013 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Based on Reappraisal of Same Facts Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts Held Invalid.

The petitioner, CitiusTech Healthcare Technology Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 27 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal: Rectification Under Section 35 of Income-tax Act Valid for Mistake Arising from Retrospective Amendment. Retrospective Operation of Proviso to Section 18-A(5) Renders Original Assessment Order Erroneous on Face of Record.

The dispute arose from the retrospective amendment of Section 18-A(5) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 by the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 195...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Capital Gains vs Business Profits Dispute. Profit on Sale of Land Held as Capital Gains Where Assessee Not in Property Development Business.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for assessment year 2004-05. The a...