Search Results for "Rape Conviction"

1023 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1023 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 452, 406, and 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The appellants, Satish Say...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 452 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Sachin s/o Vaijinath Tandale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, for offences under Sections 452 and 376 of the Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Rape Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhaulal S/o Dokraji Reswal, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the II Additional Adhoc Sessions Judge, A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rape of Tribal School Girl Under Section 376(2)(c) IPC. Teacher-cum-Rector Held Guilty of Offence Despite Discrepancies in Charge and Alleged Consent.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, arose from the conviction of Maltya Michara Gavit, a teacher-cum-rector of a Basic Ashram S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed Complaint. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mansoor @ Ismail, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru, in S.C.No.136/2011 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Delay in FIR and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ningappa S/o Basappa Cheliwadi, was convicted by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in SC 125/2009 for the offence of rape un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction under Sections 376 and 417 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Forcible Sexual Intercourse Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Angad Tikaram Chandane, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 417 (cheating) of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape and Sodomy Case under IPC Sections 376(2)(f), 377, 506. Conviction Based on Sole Testimony of Child Victim Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Mother's Testimony Under Section 157 Evidence Act; Minor Discrepancies in FIR Held Immaterial.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Ramesh Bansiram Pawar, by the Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Sessions Case No. 154 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC — Penetration Established by Medical Evidence. The court held that slight penetration is sufficient for rape and the medical evidence corroborated the victim's testimony.

The appellant, Mohammed Gaus Ibrahim Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the offence of rape under Section 376...