Search Results for "Railway accident compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Railway accident compensation"

347 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Claimant Parents in Railway Accident Compensation Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Bona Fide Passenger Status. Deceased's fall from moving local train between Mankhurd and Vashi railway stations held untoward incident under Sections 123 and 124A of Railways Act, 1989, and mere absence of ticket in inquest panchnama not sufficient to negate bona fide passenger claim.

31 Jul 2025

The litigation arose from a claim for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989 following the death of a twenty-year-old passenger who allegedly fell ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Death Due to Accidental Fall from Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989. Widow and Children Entitled to Compensation as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Fall Was Accidental, Not Self-Inflicted.

9 Feb 2018

The case involves an appeal by the widow, children, and mother of Sanjay Awachare (deceased) against the dismissal of their claim petition by the Rail...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Compensation for Passenger Injured While Deboarding Wrong Train — Negligence Not a Bar Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that an accidental fall from a train while attempting to deboard a moving train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the Railway is strictly liable for compensation regardless of the passenger's negligence.

11 Nov 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by the Union of India, through the General Manager, Central Railway, challenging the decision of the Railway Claim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Valid Ticket Recovery Establishes 'Untoward Incident' Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The Court held that recovery of a valid ticket from the deceased's body shifts the burden on the railway to prove that the death was not an untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

5 Feb 2015

The appellant, Smt. Nirmala Pravinchandra Soni, mother of the deceased Kiran Pravinchandra Soni, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Claimant Entitled to Compensation for Loss of Both Legs. Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 — Standing Near Door in Crowded Compartment Not Negligence.

18 Nov 2013

The appellant, Ravichand Khurchankar, a 26-year-old student, was travelling by Howrah-Ahmedabad Express from Gondia to Nagpur on 7 July 2002. Due to o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Negligence of Deceased Not Proved. Parents of deceased passenger awarded compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 as death occurred due to untoward incident and railway failed to prove negligence.

13 Jun 2013

The appellants, parents of the deceased, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 198...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence by Deceased. The court held that the death of a passenger due to falling from a running train due to jerk/jolt constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway is strictly liable to pay compensation unless it proves negligence or suicide.

8 Jan 2026

The present First Appeal was filed by the appellants, who are the original applicants, under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, chal...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Amputation of Both Legs Due to Fall from Train. Held that the claimant was a bona fide passenger and the incident was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling him to compensation.

24 Mar 2023

The appellant, Nagesh Gulabrao Kale, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, for injuries sustained in an untoward ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Railway Compensation for Passenger Pushed from Train by TTE — Both Legs Amputated. Held that Railway is vicariously liable for acts of its employee causing untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

25 Jun 2013

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Railway) against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which awarded compensation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Untoward Incident Despite Absence of Ticket. Court holds that death due to fall from overcrowded train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and that the burden to prove negligence or bona fide passenger status is not on claimants in such cases.

23 Mar 2021

The appellants, widow and two major sons of Shankarlal Giri, filed a claim for compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumba...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)