Search Results for "RFCTLARR Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "RFCTLARR Act"

71 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 71 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Power Grid Corporation's Appeal Against Writ Order Directing Re-determination of Compensation Under Section 24(1)(a) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Court Holds That Once Award Is Passed and Compensation Received Under 1894 Act, Proceedings Are Not Deemed to Have Lapsed Under Section 24(1)(a).

17 Apr 2026

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Power Grid Corporation of India Limited against an order dated 25.07.2022 in W.P.No.15495 of 2015. The acquis...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Non-Compliance with Both Conditions of Section 24(2). The court held that for acquisition to lapse under Section 24(2), both non-payment of compensation and non-taking of possession must be established, and the burden lies on the petitioner.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original owner Amratlal Dharamchand Shah, filed a writ petition on 19.07.2019 seeking a declaration that the acqui...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petitioners' Claim for Additional Compensation Under Section 30(3) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 on Market Value Including Multiplication Factor-2. The Court held that 'market value' under Section 3(u) includes the multiplication Factor-2 under Section 26(2), and additional compensation must be computed on that enhanced value.

26 Feb 2026

The petitioners, landowners whose land was acquired for railway purposes, challenged the award of additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the R...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. High Court's declaration of deemed lapse under Section 24(2) set aside as twin conditions of possession not taken and compensation not paid must be cumulatively satisfied, and non-payment alone does not trigger lapse.

24 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court Order on Lapse Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. High Court Erred in Declaring Acquisition Lapsed as Possession Was Taken and Compensation Deposited Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Writ Petitioner Lacked Locus Standi as Subsequent Purchaser.

20 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against a High Court judgment that declared land acquisition proceedings lapse...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 When Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Court Stay, and Stay Period Must Be Excluded from Five-Year Computation.

20 Jan 2023

The dispute originated from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondent landowner filed a writ petitio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Government of NCT of Delhi in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Overturns High Court's Declaration of Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 1986 and Compensation Not Paid Does Not Result in Lapse as per Indore Development Authority Constitution Bench Decision.

15 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Notice Issued to Deceased Person Invalid. The court held that a notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued to a person who had died before the notice is invalid, and since possession was not taken and compensation not paid, the acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Vithoba Ravaji Jadhav (since deceased through legal heir Subhash Vithoba Jadhav), owned land Gat No.422/2 at Vadgaon Bhande, Tal. Daun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Petition Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for Non-Taking of Possession and Non-Payment of Compensation. Acquisition Initiated in 1965 Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Deemed Lapsed as Neither Possession Taken Nor Compensation Paid.

13 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Joaquim Victor Fernandes, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings for his plot No. 34 admeasuring...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Compensation Deposited in Court Constitutes Valid Payment. Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Lapse After Compensation Deposited in Court on Award Date.

20 Dec 2016

The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of late Narayan Aditwar Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seekin...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)