Search Results for "Pre-emption"

60 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Indefinite Curfew Imposed Due to Burial Dispute in Mominpura Area. Court holds that curfew under Section 144 CrPC cannot be used as a permanent measure and must be proportionate to the threat.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Award of 14 January 2006 on Share Valuation Under Clause 7 of Protocol Agreement Challenged on Grounds of Jurisdiction and Legality of the Agreement.

The matter arose from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Western Maharashtra Development Corpn. Ltd. c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Company Appeal No.19 of 2009 Challenges CLB's Findings on Reduction of Shareholding, Removal of Director, and Valuation of Land Under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The case involved a dispute between shareholders of Pantheon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a company formed to acquire and develop a 13-acre property in M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Investment in Shares of Private Company for Acquiring Control Held as Capital Asset, Not Stock-in-Trade. Shares held for 31 months with transfer restrictions cannot be treated as trading asset under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Accra Investments Private Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25 April 2012 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal, Holding Royalty Payment for Mining Lease is Revenue Expenditure. Yearly royalty of Rs. 96,000 under mining arrangement with Government deductible under Income-tax Act as it relates to raw material obtained, not capital outlay.

This appeal arose from income tax assessment proceedings for the years 1954-55 to 1956-57. The appellant, a registered firm manufacturing lime from li...