Search Results for "Patently illegal"

685 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 685 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award Set Aside by Commercial Court. Court Restores Arbitral Award Holding That the Commercial Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence.

The case involves a commercial dispute between Navayuga Engineering Company (appellant) and Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited along with other ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Against Hubtown Ltd. Based on Bona Fide Dispute of Debt. Corporate Guarantee Enforcement Requires Prima Facie Case of Default and Absence of Substantial Dispute Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Hubtown...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Debenture Trustee in Recovery Suit Against Corporate Guarantor. Defendant's Triable Issues Found to be Sham and Moonshine, Entitling Plaintiff to Judgment Under Order 37 CPC.

The plaintiff, IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Hubtow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sale-Cum-Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, MSRT Corporation, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...