High Court of Karnataka Decides Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification. Notification dated 27.08.2008 Under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act Challenged as Ultra Vires.
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "Overlapping Heads"
95 result(s) found
Found 95 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 935
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Rule 8 Loss Set-Off Held Invalid. The court held that Rule 8 of Income Tax Rules, 1962 applies to both income and loss, and loss from plantation division is a business loss allowable under Rule 8.
1 Apr 2010The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Limited, filed its return of income for assessment year 2004-2005 on 29 October 2004, showing net profit before tax...
- 88
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...
- 104
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 77
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
10 Mar 2025The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...
- 936
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.
5 Feb 2016Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...
- 45
High Court
High Court of Bombay Takes Suo Moto Cognizance of COVID-19 Public Health Infrastructure in Maharashtra. Court Refers to Earlier Principal Seat Judgment Highlighting State's Obligation Under Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Disaster Management Act, 2005.
18 Aug 2020On 26.06.2020, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, registered Suo Moto Criminal Public Interest Litigation No.1 of 2020 to ad...
- 18
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates First Appeal Concerning Title to Mira Salt Works Lands and Validity of Revenue Authorities' Orders. Appeal raises questions on ownership under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, and interpretation of Government of India Act, 1935, in the context of lands originally held under indenture of lease.
30 Apr 2026The First Appeal arises from the dismissal of Special Civil Suit No.771 of 2011 by the 7th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane, on 13 April 2018...
- 47
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 71
