Search Results for "Mundkars Act"

61 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Goa Housing Board Reducing Land Compensation from ₹300 to ₹150 per sq. metre. Large Agricultural Land Acquisition Requires 50% Deduction for Development Charges Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves an appeal by the Goa Housing Board against the Judgment and Award dated 6th December 2011 passed by the Reference Court under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhanced Compensation Upheld for Irrigated Land Near Main Road. Market value fixed at Rs. 100 per sqm under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 based on location and amenities, with no evidence led by State.

The State of Goa appealed against the judgment of the District Judge, South Goa, Margao, which partly allowed the claimant's reference under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitions Seeking Re-evaluation of Judicial Service Examination Answer Sheets. No Right to Re-evaluation Exists in Absence of Specific Rules or Patent Error.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by practicing advocates who appeared for the Goa Judicial Service Examination (Civil Judge, Junior Divi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Execution Orders — Decree Holder Entitled to Possession Despite Alleged Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Execution Court Cannot Go Behind Decree; Objections Under Section 47 CPC Not Maintainable.

The applicants (judgment-debtors) filed a civil revision application challenging two orders dated 31/07/2018 and 30/10/2018 passed by the Senior Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court which confirmed the trial court...