Search Results for "Motor Accident Claims Tribunals"

185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's Use of Multiplier '18' for Deceased Aged 30 Years Held Incorrect; Proper Multiplier is '17' Under Sarla Verma Guidelines.

The appellant, Managing Director of Motor Claims Hub, BMTC, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2022 passed by the XIV Additional Small Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased was a 60-year-old agriculturist earning Rs.6,000 per month; Tribunal's notional income of Rs.4,500 per month enhanced to Rs.6,000 per month with multiplier of 9 and 1/3rd deduction for personal expenses.

The appeal was filed by the claimants (wife and children of the deceased Buddappa) under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Failure to Implead Legal Heirs of Deceased Owner Not Fatal. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim Petition Without Considering Application for Substitution Filed Before Signing of Judgment.

The appellants, legal heirs of deceased Bajirao Laxman Thorat, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Mot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation of Rs. 13 Lakhs Upheld for Death of Lecturer with Multiple Income Sources. Tribunal's Assessment of Income, Future Prospects, and Multiplier Found Correct Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the respondents, who are the widow, minor daughter, and parents of the deceased Sheshrao...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Third-Party Liability. Insurer Directed to Pay Compensation and Recover from Owner as Driver Lacked Valid Licence Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimant, Karbhari Shinde, sustained serious injuries resulting in amputation of his left leg af...