Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

196 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, as Such Power Lies Only with Revenue Tribunal or Civil Court.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Lease Created After Tillers' Day Not Subject to Purchase Obligation Under Sections 32-O and 32-P of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlord's Claim for Restoration After 32 Years Held Time-Barred and Without Termination of Tenancy.

9 Feb 2024

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original tenant, challenged the orders of the Tahsildar and the appellate authority directing eviction and restora...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court's Refusal to Refer Tenancy Issue to Competent Authority. Jurisdictional Question of Tenancy Must Be Decided by Tenancy Court Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

11 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Saiyyed Wase Ahmed, challenged the order of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nawapur, dated 12th January 2018, which refused to refe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Exemption Case — Trust Registration After Tillers' Day Does Not Bar Exemption Under Section 88B of Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court held that the exemption under Section 88B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 applies to land belonging to an institution of public religious worship, regardless of when the trust was formally registered, and the tenants did not become deemed purchasers on Tillers' Day.

18 Sep 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court that quashed an exemption certificate issued under Section 88B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

12 Oct 2018

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court held that the appellants failed to prove their title over the suit property and that the sale deed executed by the original owner in favor of the respondents was valid.

23 Dec 2014

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in respect of agricultural land. They claimed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute — Finds No Error in Revenue Authority's Order Based on Prior Civil Court Decree. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Petition Barred by Delay and Laches.

28 Apr 2014

The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Shankar Bandgar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Latur, dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Orders in Tenancy Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioners failed to prove personal cultivation and that tenants were entitled to purchase land under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

7 Dec 2010

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Madhav Dashrath Vahadane and Nivrutti Dashrath Vahadane (petitioners) challenging orders passed u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. The court held that concurrent findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioners (heirs of the original plaintiff) challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts i...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)