Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

678 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Held That Demolition Without Prior Notice Under Section 53(1) Is Illegal. The Court directed restoration of the demolished structure and compensation for loss caused by the illegal demolition.

21 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Anil Banarasidas Jindal (since deceased, through legal heirs) and Narayan Appasaheb Chalge, filed a writ petition challenging the dem...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

16 Aug 2018

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Pimpri-Chinchwad New Town Development Authority — Compensation Enhancement Granted. Landowners entitled to higher compensation under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquisitions under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2019

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by landowners and a developer challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Pimpri-Chinch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Reservation Lapses Only Upon Valid Notice Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, Not Mere Passage of Time. The court ruled that without a valid notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, the High Court cannot declare reserved land free from reservation even after an inordinate delay.

13 Mar 2023

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, by three pet...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Considers Petitions Against Infrastructure Cost Levies by Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority. The Petitions Raise Constitutional and Statutory Challenges Under Articles 14, 265 and the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966.

15 Sep 2025

The dispute arose from demands for infrastructure cost and STP charges made by the Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (NMRDA) against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development Plan Reservation and TDR Compensation in Kolhapur. Court upholds reservation of land for playground and finds that TDR is valid compensation under MRTP Act, 1966.

4 May 2023

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by M/s. Bhima Mahabharat Builders and Developers, Zakir Nasirruddin Peerzade, and Anand rao Mahadeo M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition on Lapsing of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act — Purchase Notice After Ten Years from Final Development Plan but Before Ten Years from Revised Development Plan Triggers Lapsing of Reservation. The Court held that the period of ten years for serving a purchase notice under Section 127 is to be reckoned from the date of the final development plan, not the revised development plan.

4 May 2023

The petitioners, owners of land in Mohpa, Nagpur, filed a writ petition challenging the continued reservation of their land for a weekly market and sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Release Land from Reservation Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Reservation Lapses Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. The court held that the petitioner's land, reserved for playground and primary school since 1994, became free from reservation after the planning authority failed to acquire it within 12 months of the purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

31 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Lalchand s/o Hemandas Sainani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aura...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition for Mandamus in Town Planning Acquisition Case — State Directed to Issue Declaration Under Section 126(2) MRTP Act for Playground Reservation. Failure to Complete Acquisition Despite Deposit of Compensation Entities Landowner to Writ of Mandamus Under Section 126(4) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Aug 2018

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Revision Survey No.138 admeasuring 3 Hectares and 65 Ares in Kolhapur, sought a writ of mandamus directing the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)