Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961"

408 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 408 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery Notices for Excess Wages Paid to Employees. Recovery of wages paid under mistake of law held impermissible without prior notice and opportunity of hearing.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 30/09/2005 passed by the Industrial Court, L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Exemption Case. Assessee Held Eligible for Exemption Under Section 10(20A) as Development Authority and Business Commenced in Relevant Year.

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...