Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on Agreement. Court holds that stamp duty is a fiscal matter and not a bar to appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Lloyds Realty Developers Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Reserves Order on Interim Measures in Intellectual Property Dispute with Foreign Seated Arbitration. Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Questions Indian Court's Jurisdiction and Maintainability of Mandatory Injunction.

The applicant, a Singapore-incorporated company engaged in software development, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract and Prior Section 9 Filing at Salem Confer Jurisdiction on Salem Courts Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The revision petitioner, Waterbury Farrel, a division of Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc., Canada, filed Arb.O.P.No.103 of 2019 before the Principa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Arbitral Award Passed Outside State — Stamp Duty Payable Only Where Award is Made Under Section 3 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. Arbitral Award Made in Mumbai Not Subject to Karnataka Stamp Duty When Sought to be Executed in Karnataka.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd, a financial institution, entered into a loan agreement with respondents No. 1 and 2. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Documents in Arbitration Petition Despite Delay, Subject to Costs — Charge-Sheet Filed Against Contractor Relevant to Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two notices of motion filed in pending commercial arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on MSMED Act to Larger Bench. Balancing statutory remedies with writ jurisdiction: Supreme Court deliberates over MSMED Act provisions and alternative remedies.

The Supreme Court of India examines whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable against an order passed by the Micro...