Search Results for "Joint Hindu family business"

253 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 253 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Gift Deed and Partition. Family Settlement of 1953 Held Valid Despite Non-Registration, and Gift by Widow to Grandson Upheld as Binding on Heirs.

The dispute pertains to properties originally owned by Balaji, who died intestate in 1932. His widow Laxmibai and three sons Harihar, Keshao, and Krus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-emption Claim Under Section 22 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — Testamentary Succession Bars Intestate Right. Property Devolution by Will Excludes Statutory Right of Pre-emption as Section 22 Applies Only to Intestate Property.

The case involves a dispute over a suit property (Plot No.21, Laxmi Nagar, Nagpur) originally purchased by late Kashinath Subhedar in the name of his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit Involving Tenancy Rights of Joint Hindu Family. Tenancy rights in suit property held not to be joint family property and not liable for partition.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the defendant-appellant against the judgment and de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit Involving Tenancy Rights of Joint Hindu Family. Court Holds That Tenancy Rights Are Not Joint Family Property and Cannot Be Partitioned Under Hindu Law.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the defendant against the judgment and decree of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Minor Children Seeking to Set Aside Family Settlement — Memorandum of Family Settlement Held Binding as a Family Arrangement Under Contract Act and Specific Relief Act

The plaintiffs, four children of Madhupati and Anuradha Singhania (Defendants 1 and 2), filed a suit seeking cancellation of a Memorandum of Family Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's title as sole heir was established and the defendant failed to prove adverse possession.

The second appeal arose from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds lower appellate court's decree confirming plaintiff's title and possession based on sale deed and adverse possession.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a property dispute. The original plaintiff (sin...