Search Results for "Government Resolution 2024"

954 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 954 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Municipal Corporation's Promotion Process for Superintending Engineer Posts Due to Non-Compliance with Court Directions and Violation of Service Rules

The High Court allowed a writ petition filed by four Executive Engineers of Municipal Corporation challenging their exclusion from promotion to Superi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th Dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Order Appointing Administrator under Section 77A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Petitioners Contend Registrar Failed to Exhaust Options of Internal Management and Erroneously Declared Committee Inoperative Due to Invalid Co-option.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 1 July 2025 of the Minister of Co-op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Surplus Declaration and Absorption Order Against School Teacher for Violation of Rule 26 of MEPS Rules, 1981. Procedural Lapses in Declaring Employee Surplus and Transferring Without Consent or Opportunity of Hearing Lead to Setting Aside of Orders.

The petitioner, Amar Jaggnath Lavate, a teacher employed at Nutan Vidyalaya, Lote (now Kavita Vinod Saraf High School), was declared a surplus employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — Party Cannot Take Inconsistent Stances. Original Respondent's written commitment to a court-appointed sole arbitrator binds it, and its subsequent objection to the appointment is inequitable conduct.

The Original Respondent (Global Zone Sanitory Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.) filed a Review Petition against an order dated June 20, 2024, appointing a sol...