Search Results for "Godrej & Boyce"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Godrej & Boyce"

103 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging LARR Authority Orders Allowing Condonation of Delay and Amendment in Land Acquisition Reference. Procedural Flexibility Upheld Under Section 64 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 to Ensure Substantive Justice.

24 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited, owned approximately 10 acres of land in Village Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was acquired by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Challenge to Re-Reservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Reservation Lapses Due to Failure to Acquire Within Statutory Period. Re-reservation of land for playground and school after expiry of one year from lapsing of earlier reservation held invalid under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

4 Dec 2025

The petitioners, Mukund Mohan Kurunbhatti and Subodh Motichand Bundelchandi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

16 Aug 2018

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Held That Demolition Without Prior Notice Under Section 53(1) Is Illegal. The Court directed restoration of the demolished structure and compensation for loss caused by the illegal demolition.

21 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Anil Banarasidas Jindal (since deceased, through legal heirs) and Narayan Appasaheb Chalge, filed a writ petition challenging the dem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows De-reservation of Plot Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Within Time. The court held that the reservation on the petitioner's plot lapsed due to the respondents' failure to acquire the plot within the prescribed period after service of purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966.

22 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Ashok Shriram Kulkarni, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking de-reservation of a plot bearing CTS 339 1/A – A/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice and Order in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Stators and Rotors of Hermetic Motors Classifiable as Parts of Electric Motors, Not Compressors. Approved Classification Lists Cannot Be Reopened Without Fresh Material Under Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

23 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged a show cause notice dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

30 Mar 2015

The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Construction of Residential Service Apartments in IT Park Under IT Policy 2009. MIDC's refusal to approve amended plans quashed as arbitrary and contrary to the IT Policy 2009 and the provisional commencement certificate granted earlier.

31 Jul 2012

The petitioners, National Standard (India) Limited and its director, challenged an order dated 14/9/2011 by which the Maharashtra Industrial Developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Refund Under Section 214 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Held That Interest Is Mandatory and Must Be Paid on Entire Refund Amount from Date of Payment of Advance Tax.

10 Aug 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14.6.1988 passed by the Commissioner of Income Ta...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)