Search Results for "Global settlement"

228 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 228 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Foreign Company in Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Foreign Award Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Challenge to Foreign Award Lies Only Under Sections 47-48 for Enforcement, Overruling Bombay High Court's Reliance on Bhatia International.

The appellant, Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA (now Noy Ambiente S.p.a), an Italian company, challenged a judgment of the Bombay High Court which held t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Appeal in Debt Dispute — Company Deemed Unable to Pay Debts Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. Debt Acknowledged by Respondent Company and Not Bona Fide Disputed, Entitling Appellant to Winding Up Order.

The Appellant, Tata Advanced Materials Ltd., filed a winding up petition against the Respondent, M/s. Tooltech Global Engineering Pvt. Ltd., under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Applicability of Section 9 of Arbitration Act to Foreign-Seated Arbitration. The Appeal Concerns Interim Measures in a Contract Governed by English Law with Arbitration in London.

The dispute arose out of an agreement dated 20.10.2010 between Harmony Innovation Shipping Ltd. (appellant) and Gupta Coal India Ltd. (first responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition from Karnataka to Maharashtra for Convenience of Wife. Transfer Granted Under Section 25 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Due to Wife's Hardship from Distance, Lack of Companionship, and Language Barriers in Contesting Case in Karnataka.

The background of the dispute involved a matrimonial conflict between a husband and wife who married in December 2020 after meeting on Facebook. The w...