Search Results for "Court Fees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Court Fees"

4448 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4448 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees After Debts Recovery Tribunal Returned Application for Lack of Jurisdiction. Cooperative Bank's Recovery Proceeding Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 Was Not Maintainable Before DRT, and High Court Directed Refund of Entire Court Fees Under Inherent Powers as No Adjudication on Merits Occurred.

21 Feb 2020

The first petitioner, Nagpur District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order on Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Preliminary Findings on Maintainability and Court Fee in Easementary Suit; Trial Court Had Ruled That the Suit for Declaration of Easementary Right-of-Way Was Properly Valued Under Sections 24(d), 26(a), and 30 of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, and Not Based on Market Value of the Property Under Section 24(a).

20 Jul 2026

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the order dated 10.10.2025 passed by the Civil Judge and JMFC, K...

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conversion Fees Under Goa Land Revenue Code — Application Date Determines Applicable Rate. Conversion fees must be calculated based on rates prevailing on date of application under Section 32 of Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968, not on date of order.

13 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira, along with co-owners, applied on 08.03.2013 under Section 32 of the Goa Daman and Diu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Suit Involving Agreement for Flat Purchase. Amendment Seeking Declaration of Invalidity of Subsequent Sale Contract Held Governed by Section 6(iv)(ha) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959; City Civil Court Loses Pecuniary Jurisdiction.

1 Dec 2010

The appeal arose from an order passed by the Judge, City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, returning the plaint to the appellant under Order 7 Rule 10 of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Locus of Parents in Fee Regulation. Individual parents held to have standing under Maharashtra Educational Institutes (Regulation of Fees) Act to approach Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee.

18 Jul 2017

The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions challenging the locus of individual parents to approach the Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee (DFRC) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Appellate Court's Order Directing Deposit of Fair Market Rent as Pre-condition for Stay of Eviction Decree in License Case. The court held that the principle of Atma Ram Properties applies to licensees but the Appellate Court cannot split the period of unlawful occupation; the licensee must deposit contractual compensation from termination of license till disposal of appeal.

27 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Safset Agencies Private Ltd., a company dealing in art, was a licensee under a Leave and Licence Agreement dated 25 September 2006 wit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Fee Regulation Act in Challenge by Parents' Association — School Fee Fixation Must Comply with Statutory Framework Under Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2013. The court held that the Act and Rules are constitutionally valid and directed the Fee Regulatory Committee to reconsider the fee structure.

7 Aug 2018

The petitioners, Khed Taluka Vidyarthi Palak Sangh (a society registered under the Maharashtra Societies Registration Act, 1860) and Kiran Kamlakar Kh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Property Suit — Valuation Based on Market Value Determines Forum. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Over Non-Agricultural Property Must Be Valued Under Section 6 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959; Plaintiffs Directed to Pay Deficit Court Fees.

13 Apr 2015

The case involves a challenge to an order dated 28 October 2014 passed by the 16th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune, which held that the court...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)