Search Results for "Building Permissions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Building Permissions"

720 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 720 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Challenge by Developer to Unilateral Deemed Conveyance Orders Passed by Competent Authority Under MOFA. Developer Argues Conveyed Land Exceeds Area Agreed in Section 4 Agreements and Jeopardises Pending Construction; Court Examines Principles of Land Division and Effect of Amalgamated Layout.

28 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a developer, filed two writ petitions challenging orders dated 22 November 2023 and 2 June 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registra...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Floors Constructed Without Approval. Court holds that occupants of illegally constructed floors cannot claim violation of natural justice when notices were served on the owner/developer and society, and the BMC is not precluded from acting on glaring illegalities beyond the scope of a prior writ petition.

11 Sep 2024

The Petitioner, an occupant of Flat No.801 on the 8th floor of Shivanjali Co-operative Housing Society building, challenged a notice dated 12th June 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restrictions Near Naval Air Station — No Violation of Right to Development Found. Height restrictions imposed under Section 9A of the Aircraft Act, 1934 and Rule 44 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 for safety of aircraft operations are reasonable and not arbitrary.

9 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Vikram Delite Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Shree Ramkrishn Enterprises, and Parikshit Miglani, filed a writ petition under Arti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

19 Oct 2018

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Development Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Slum Rehabilitation Authority. Court holds that developer's unilateral action of obtaining SRA approval for redevelopment on petitioner's plot without consent does not warrant interim relief under Section 9 of Arbitration Act as the agreement contained arbitration clause and petitioner failed to show irreparable injury.

4 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Jai Neptune Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation.

7 May 2015

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Petition Challenging Construction of Residential Building and Public Parking Lot under DCR and MRTP Act — Court Examines Legality of Approvals and Concessions Granted by Municipal Commissioner. The Court Considers Whether Circular Restricting Public Parking Lots to Four Floors Overrides Provisions of DCR 33(24) and Implications of Notices under Sections 51 and 53(1) of MRTP Act.

13 May 2013

The Public Interest Litigation petition filed in 2012 before the Bombay High Court challenged the legality of approvals and construction of a 56‑sto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Dual Proceedings on Cooperative Housing Society Dispute Over Change of User and Structural Alterations. The Court Examines Legality of Converting Residential Flats to Nursing Home and Making Additions Without Consent Under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

5 May 2006

The matter involved two consolidated proceedings: a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Maharasht...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)