Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

315 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Stamp Duty on Renewal of Perpetual Lease Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Levy of stamp duty on renewal of perpetual lease is not manifestly arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur, through a division bench comprising Justices Anil S. Kilor and Rajnish R. Vyas, dismissed two writ petitions challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Impound Agreement of Sale in Specific Performance Suit. Notarised Agreement of Sale Not an Instrument Chargeable with Stamp Duty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioners (defendants in the suit) challenged a common order dated 22/8/2019 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Pune in Special Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Stamp Duty Exemption Case — Agreement to Lease Not a Lease, Notification Exemption Inapplicable. The court held that a document which is only an agreement to execute a lease in future does not qualify as a lease for exemption under the Bombay Stamps Act, 1958.

The appellant, Pankaj Ramlakhan Dubey, proprietor of M/s. Vedamsh Agro Food Products, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of a learned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Rejection of Refund Applications Under Maharashtra Stamp Act. Refund of Stamp Duty on Deemed Cancellation of Agreements for Sale Allowed Where Agreements Were Not Registered and No Instrument of Cancellation Was Executed.

The Petitioners, Qwik Supply Chain Pvt Ltd and another, filed two Writ Petitions challenging the orders dated 07.03.2015 and 08.02.2018 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Stamp Duty Dispute — Agreement for Sale Without Possession Delivery Not a Conveyance Under Article 25 Schedule I of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Document Dated 03/3/2000 Held to Be Mere Agreement for Sale, Not Requiring Stamp Duty as Conveyance.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellants (legal representatives of the original defendant) against a judgment of a learned Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Bombay High Court's Decision on Stamp Duty Refund for National Organic Chemical India Ltd. Maximum Cap on Stamp Duty a One-Time Payment, Rules Apex Court.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra, upholding the Bombay High Court's decision that granted National Organic Che...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...