Search Results for "Bombay Police Act Section 135"

746 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 746 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Fifteen Accused Against Conviction for Murder, Attempt to Murder and Rioting Armed with Deadly Weapons. Trial Court Convictions Under Sections 302, 307, 324, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504 IPC and Fine Imposed, While Acquittal Under Bombay Police Act Maintained.

The case arose from a family dispute over ill-treatment of the complainant's sister by her husband's family. On 20 November 2003, the complainant's si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Habeas Corpus Petition Examines Legality of Judicial Custody Where Remand Was Not Extended by Competent MCOC Special Court; Accused in Telgi Stamp Scam Seek Release After Non‑Extension of Judicial Remand Under Section 309(2) CrPC by a Judge Not Appointed Under MCOC Act.

The petitioners, five accused in the Telgi stamp scam (Special Case No. 2 of 2003 before the MCOC Court at Pune), filed this writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Material and Non-Application of Mind in Granting Approval and Sanction. Appellants Discharged Under Section 227 CrPC as Material on Record Did Not Warrant Framing of Charge Under MCOC Act.

The present appeals were filed by Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal and Umesh Mohan Kirve, who were accused Nos. 3 and 9 respectively in a case registered under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chapter Proceedings Against Social Workers for Lack of Material — Notices Under Sections 110(e)(g) and 111 CrPC Set Aside as Based on Stale and Acquitted Cases Without Proximate Connection to Public Order

The petitioners, Dinesh Vitthal Patil and Bharat Vitthal Patil, were social workers and members of a political party residing in Malegaon, Nashik. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Illegal Detention in Chapter Proceedings — Violation of D.K. Basu Guidelines. Petitioner awarded Rs. 25,000 for being detained over 24 hours without production before Magistrate in Chapter Proceeding No. 68/2005 under Section 107 of CrPC.

The petitioner, Balasaheb Sadanand Bhagat @ Bhakta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking compensa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Electricity Theft Case Against Owner — Mere Ownership Not Sufficient for Section 135 Liability. The court held that without specific evidence of direct involvement in tampering, the owner cannot be prosecuted under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The applicant, Navin Prakashsingh Thakur, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Partly in Fatal Accident Case, Reduces Sentence for Rash Driving. Court holds that conviction under Section 304-A IPC without specific charge is valid if no prejudice, and reduces sentence to period already undergone for young driver with family.

The appellant, Rajkumar Dhunichand Sharma, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, for offences under Sections 307 and 304-A of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Accused in Smuggling Case; Customs Officers Held Not to Be Police Officers Under Section 25 Evidence Act. Confessional Statements to Customs Officers Admissible; No Violation of Article 20(3) as Accused Not Formally Accused During Inquiry Stage.

The Assistant Collector of Customs filed a complaint against Romesh Chandra Mehta and four others for conspiracy under section 120-B of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused from MCOC Act Offences for Lack of Sanction and Prima Facie Case. The court held that the sanction under Section 23(1)(a) of MCOC Act was invalid and the allegations did not constitute 'organised crime' under Section 2(1)(e) of the Act.

The appellants, original accused nos.1 to 6 in MCOC Special Case No.5 of 2016 pending before the Special Judge (under the MCOC Act), Pune, filed an ap...