Search Results for "Assistant Lecturer"

121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Adverse ACR Where Reporting and Reviewing Officer Were Same — Violation of Natural Justice. Confidential remarks set aside as the reviewing officer, being the same person as the reporting officer, failed to provide independent scrutiny, rendering the entry unsustainable.

The petitioner, a Lecturer appointed in 1999, challenged an adverse entry recorded in his Annual Confidential Report (ACR) for the period from 19 July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses College's Appeals in Faculty Termination Case Under AICTE Regulations. Termination of Professors Due to Closure of Engineering Course Held Impermissible as AICTE Regulations Mandate Continuation Till Superannuation at Age 65, Regardless of Financial Viability.

The dispute involved Appellant challenging a Single Judge's order that prevented the termination of two professors, following the closure of the unaid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Alleged Excess Payments from D.Ed College Employees — Recovery Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Refixation of Pay Scale and Grade Pay Set Aside as Unilateral and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

The judgment concerns a group of nine writ petitions filed by employees of D.Ed colleges in Maharashtra, challenging the recovery of amounts allegedly...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Employees Appointed Without Following Statutory Recruitment Rules in Education Sector. Appointments Made Without Approval of Competent Authority and Without Following Reservation Policy Are Void Ab Initio.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, disposed of four writ petitions filed by employees challenging their termination from service. The petitioners we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Bond Obligation for Super-Speciality Doctors in Public Medical Colleges — Service Condition and Penalty Valid Under Article 226. Doctors Who Completed D.M./M.Ch. Courses Must Serve Two Years or Pay Rs.25 Lakhs Penalty as Per Government Resolution Dated 8 February 2008.

The petitioners, comprising 62 doctors in the first petition and 69 in the second, were doctors who had either completed or were pursuing super-specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Dentists' Petitions Against Bond Penalty — Bond Agreement Found Void for Lack of Consideration and Unilateral Modification. Government Cannot Recover Bond Amount When Service Conditions Are Changed Unilaterally and No Actual Loss Is Proved.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by dentists who completed post-graduate dental courses from Government Dental College, Nagpur, under ...