Search Results for "substantial damage"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "substantial damage"

918 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 918 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'SUPER MOR CHHAP' Held Deceptively Similar to 'MOR CHHAP'. Registration and Prior Use of 'MOR CHHAP' for Lime Plaster Entitled Plaintiff to Protection Under Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958.

30 Sep 2016

The plaintiff, Sunil Manikchand Kasliwal, filed a suit for trade mark infringement against the defendant, Rahul Uttam Suryavanshi, alleging that the d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forest Conservation Case Against Railway Land Development. NGT's Finding That Land Is Not Forest Land Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Upheld, as Appellants Failed to Prove Land Met Statutory Definition and Provided Unauthorized Evidence.

20 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dismissing an original application challenging a Request for Proposal (RFP) issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — CESTAT's Finding of Baseless Charges Upheld. Penalty Dropped as Evidence Lacked Direct Link to Respondent Under Customs Act, 1962.

15 Dec 2022

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Set Aside Due to Gaps in Chain of Circumstances. Failure to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory Beyond Reasonable Doubt Leads to Benefit of Doubt Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 201, 120B.

9 Jun 2026

The appellant, Vrishal Madhukar Kalane, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the mur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Under Section 26 of Domestic Violence Act in Divorce Proceedings. Application Under Section 26 of DV Act Held Maintainable in Civil Suit for Divorce, and Appeal Under Section 29 Lies to Sessions Court Against Order of Civil Court.

5 May 2017

The petitioner, Shri Narayan Babi Salgaonkar, a police constable, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging an or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Valuers in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act as Complainant Failed to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 NI Act is rebuttable and the complainant must prima facie show a legally enforceable debt.

6 Dec 2017

The judgment pertains to three criminal applications filed by Ramesh Dahyalal Shah, Yardi Prabhu Consultants & Valuers Pvt. Ltd., and Ashwinkumar Shet...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal's Reading Down of Forest Watcher Recruitment Rules to Include Candidates from Adjoining Villages. The court held that the 5 km radius restriction was arbitrary and discriminatory under Article 14 of the Constitution, and the rule must be read down to include villages adjoining the forest area.

22 Jan 2014

The case involves writ petitions filed by the State of Karnataka and forest department officials against an order of the Karnataka Administrative Trib...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

8 Jul 2026

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Plaintiff as Absolute Owner and Ordering Delivery of Possession. Deemed University's Land Acquisition and Possession Dispute Involving Application of Land Acquisition Act, Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, and Section 96 of CPC.

6 Jun 2016

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), a deemed university and society registered...

57 58 59 60 61

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)