Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Plaintiff as Absolute Owner and Ordering Delivery of Possession. Deemed University's Land Acquisition and Possession Dispute Involving Application of Land Acquisition Act, Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, and Section 96 of CPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), a deemed university and society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, for declaration of ownership and possession of 'B' schedule property, which is part of a larger land originally acquired by the Government of His Highness Maharaja of Mysore in 1944 for a Tuberculosis Sanitarium. The acquisition was carried out under the Land Acquisition Act, invoking emergency provisions and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5-A. The acquired land included the 'A' schedule property, of which 'B' schedule is a portion. The State of Karnataka later allotted 14 acres of this land to NIMHANS in 1981 for expanding its activities. The plaintiff-institute claimed absolute ownership and sought possession from the defendants (appellants herein), who were in occupation. The trial court in O.S.No.9155/2004 partly decreed the suit on 24.01.2008, declaring NIMHANS as absolute owner of 'B' schedule property and directing defendant Nos.22 to 39 to deliver possession. Aggrieved by this decree, the defendants filed the present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The appeal was heard by a Division Bench of the High Court comprising Justice N. Kumar and Justice S. Sujatha. The presented text, however, breaks off before any legal analysis or final order of the High Court, covering only the factual background of the land acquisition and the trial court's decree.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010251952008_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (06) 1

R.F.A.No.337/2008

2016-06-06

N. Kumar, S. Sujatha

Udaya Holla, G.S. Bhat, D.L.N. Rao, A. Madhusudhan Rao, K. Jayaprakash Rao, A. Feroze Nizam, M.D. Basavanna, S.M. Hegde Kadare, Shankarappa

K.V. Shivakumar, Smt. S. Gayathri, M/s Archana Complex, Smt. S. Sunitha, B.M. Sunil, B.M. Suhas, Smt. B.M. Suvarna, B.S. Manoranjan, Smt. S. Vasundhara, R. Shekhar, P.R. Ashwathanarayanan, T.N. Suresh, Smt. Meera Nandakumar, D. Vijayaraghavan, B.V. Vijaya Kumar

National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (Deemed University), Smt. Ramakka, Sri A. Venkatesh, A. Govindappa, A. Srinivasa, A. Jayaram, A. Krishnappa, A. Ramachandra, A. Shivakumar, Smt. A. Sowbhagyavathi, Dasappa, Smt. Yellamma, Smt. Lakshmamma, Smt. T. Shantha, P. Padmamma, T. Shantharaju, T. Krishna, Smt. T. Vijaya, Smt. T. Manjula, T. Shivakumar, Smt. T. Nagarathna, Smt. T. Pushpa, Smt. Muniyamma, Sri Pillaiah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Regular First Appeal against trial court decree granting declaration of ownership and possession of suit property.

Remedy Sought

Appellants (defendants in trial court) sought to set aside the trial court decree and dismiss the suit.

Filing Reason

Trial court decreed suit declaring plaintiff as absolute owner and directing defendants to deliver possession; defendants appealed.

Previous Decisions

The IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No.9155/2004, partly decreed the suit on 24.01.2008, declaring plaintiff absolute owner of B schedule property and directing defendants 22-39 to deliver possession.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiff is National Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience (deemed university), a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. The suit pertains to a portion of ‘A’ schedule property measuring about 3.05 acres which is described in the schedule ‘B’ property, the schedule property. The Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru District took possession of the entire lands covered by the notifications. The title in the said lands vested in the State Government free from all encum...

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed O.S.No.9155/2004 before the IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, for declaration and possession. The trial court partly decreed the suit on 24.01.2008. The defendants filed Regular First Appeal No.337/2008 before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The appeal came up for hearing on 06.06.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 96
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(2), 5(A), 17(4)
  • Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka, Gulbarga Bench, hears appeal against part decree in O.S. No. 125/2004 granting specific performance of oral agreement for sale.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Knife Attack Case. Single Chest Blow Not Objectively Sufficient to Cause Death Under Section 300 Thirdly of IPC, Conviction Reduced to Section 304 Part II.