Search Results for "sentence upheld"

2732 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2732 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in MSRTC Cash Robbery Case. Evidence of Injured Employees and Medical Reports Sufficient to Prove Robbery and Hurt Under Sections 394 and 332 IPC.

The applicant, Suresh Ananda Lohar, along with another accused Jagannath Shenekar, was prosecuted for offences under Sections 394 (robbery) and 332 (v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor - Seven-Year Sentence Affirmed. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Balaji Maruti Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Girl. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence of Pregnancy Confirm Offences Under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ravindra @ Balu s/o Sonaji Hivrale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Life Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Love Affair. The court held that the prosecution established a complete chain of circumstances under Sections 302, 201, and 120-B IPC, including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon.

The appellants, Bhupendrakumar Naginbhai Mayavanshi and another, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Sessions Case No.42 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Thippeswamy @ Thippeshi, Nagendrappa @ Nagaraja, and Jayamma (appellants/accused Nos. 1 to 3) against the judg...