High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Pertaining to Agricultural University Employees. Disputes Concern Employment Status and Retirement Benefits Under Maharashtra Agricultural Universities Act, 1968.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "oral inquiry not required"
2784 result(s) found
Found 2784 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Ex-Judicial Officer Challenging Dismissal for Misconduct. Departmental inquiry found to be fair and charges proved, upholding dismissal under Rule 5 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979.
24 Jan 2012The petitioner, a former judicial officer, challenged his dismissal from service by an order dated 31 October 2006 passed by the Joint Secretary in th...
- 129
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Discharge Accused in Fake Currency Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Involvement Found Sufficient for Trial Under Sections 489B and 489C IPC.
24 Apr 2019The appellant, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, was implicated in a case involving the possession and sale of counterfeit Saudi Arabian Riyal currency ...
- 249
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of Professor for Sexual Harassment Due to Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the Syndicate's resolution to terminate the petitioner without providing a copy of the inquiry report and without affording an opportunity of hearing was illegal and arbitrary.
7 Aug 2013The petitioner, Dr. K.M. Hosamani, a Professor of Organic Chemistry at Karnatak University, Dharwad, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...
- 79
High Court
High Court of Bombay Habeas Corpus Petition Examines Legality of Judicial Custody Where Remand Was Not Extended by Competent MCOC Special Court; Accused in Telgi Stamp Scam Seek Release After Non‑Extension of Judicial Remand Under Section 309(2) CrPC by a Judge Not Appointed Under MCOC Act.
14 Oct 2005The petitioners, five accused in the Telgi stamp scam (Special Case No. 2 of 2003 before the MCOC Court at Pune), filed this writ petition under Artic...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.
1 Jan 2020The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...
- 270
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Dowry Death and Cruelty in Dowry Demand Case. Presumption under Section 113B of Evidence Act applied as death occurred within seven years of marriage and dowry demand was proved.
22 Jun 2011The appellant, Vasant Bhagwat Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 304B, 306, 498A of the India...
- 87
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Between Two Government Companies. Key Issue Involves Scope of Act and Validity of Second Eviction Notice Based on Security Ground Not Mentioned in Original Termination Notice.
17 Dec 2012The petitioner, Indian Petro Chemicals Corporation Limited, a Government company, occupied premises on the 9th and 19th floors of Air India Building, ...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Osho Foundation Dispute — Appointment of Trustees Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Trust Deed Provisions. The court held that the Charity Commissioner's power under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 must be exercised in accordance with the trust deed and after hearing all interested parties.
8 Apr 2024The petitioner, Osho International Foundation, a public trust, challenged the order of the Charity Commissioner, Maharashtra State, dated 8 April 2024...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Motorcyclist — Deceased Pillion Rider's Death Caused by Rash Driving, Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of No Negligence. The court held that in a single-vehicle accident involving a pillion rider, the burden to explain the accident lies on the rider, and failure to do so leads to an inference of negligence against the rider under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
5 Sep 2014The case pertains to a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Josepha Fernandes @ Josepha Da Silva, who died in a motorcycle accident on 17....
- 131
