Search Results for "long delay"

4563 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4563 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Labour Court Award in MSRTC Employee Back Wages Case — Full Back Wages Reduced to 50% Due to Employee's Laches and Delay in Prosecuting Remedy. Employee's removal under unconstitutional regulation did not automatically entitle full back wages; conduct and delay relevant.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the Labour Court's award dated 18/10/2008 in IDA Reference No. 4/2007...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Labour Court Order Dismissing Recovery Application on Delay Grounds in Industrial Dispute Case. Held that Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and delay should be condoned if sufficient cause shown.

The petitioner, Gosai Pravingiri Dharmgiri, was appointed as a Chemist on 18.05.1981 with respondent No.1, Ashok Organic Industries Ltd., at Vadodara....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 42 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Tmt. Valarmathi, mother of the detenu Thiru Jayaprakash, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order in Drug Offender Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Preventive Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Set Aside as Delay of 40 Days Between Arrest and Order Remained Unexplained.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Thirumoorthy, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 snaps live link, rendering detention invalid.

The petitioner, Thiru Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 02....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Preventive Detention Order Under Sexual Offender Act Set Aside as Live Link Snapped.

The petitioner, Kumaresan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the ...