Search Results for "exhaustive provisions"

1761 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1761 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Tax Fraud Prosecution, Holding Concurrent Charges Under Income Tax Act and IPC Valid. Section 52 of Income Tax Act 1922 and Section 177 IPC Can Be Applied Simultaneously Without Implied Repeal, as Former Is Merely Procedural and Cumulative.

The appellant, a cinema actor, filed income tax returns for the assessment years 1958-59 to 1961-62. The respondent, at the instance of the Inspecting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Consent Terms Binding on Successor Developer. Petitioners' Entitlement to Two Shops of 409 Sq Ft Each Upheld Based on Consent Terms in Suit No.1994 of 2008.

The petitioners, Alphonso D'Souza and Vanessa D'Souza, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 5th January 2022 passed by the Apex Grievances...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Council of Architecture's Appeal, Upholds That Section 37 of Architects Act Only Prohibits Use of Title 'Architect'. Government Posts Titled 'Architect' Can Be Held by Unregistered Individuals as the Act Does Not Prohibit Practice of Architecture.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment that Section 37 of the Architects Act, 1972 only prohibits unregister...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Trust Dispute for Non-Compliance with Section 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. Suit by devotees challenging removal of deity held barred without Charity Commissioner's consent.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by defendant trustees (defendant Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5) in a suit seeking rejection of the plaint under Order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Striking Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-compliance with interim orders under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 leads to striking off defence under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 4 October 2012, which allowed a motion under Order 39 Rule 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Bunkers Arrest Case. Bunkers on board a ship can be arrested and sold separately under admiralty jurisdiction as they are not part of the ship.

The appellant, Mansel Limited, a Bermuda company engaged in chartering vessels, filed an admiralty suit seeking arrest of bunkers on board the vessel ...