Search Results for "conversion date"

1231 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1231 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Housing Society Challenging Orders Under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Society's refusal to admit purchaser as member and issue NOC for plot transfer was set aside as applicant fulfilled all eligibility criteria.

The petitioner, The Ichalkaranji Ex-serviceman Housing Society Limited, challenged an order dated 11.02.2025 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR in Forgery Case Due to Bar Under Section 195 Cr.P.C. — Allegations Pertaining to Proceedings Before Revenue Court Require Complaint by That Court.

The petitioner, Anthony Roque D'Souza, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.178/2023 registered at Mapu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in MEIS Export Incentive Case — Policy Relaxation Committee's Rejection Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind. Amendment of Shipping Bills Under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962 Held Valid and Binding on DGFT for Grant of MEIS Benefits.

The petitioner, Technocraft Industries (India) Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, manufactures scaffolding steel products ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit. No Prima Facie Case for Injunction When Possession Not Delivered and Agreement Ambiguous.

The appellant, Sanjay Suganchand Kasliwal, proprietor of Kasliwal Construction, filed an Appeal from Order under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Panchayat's Refusal to Renew Construction Licence — Held that Panchayat Cannot Sit in Appeal Over GCZMA's Determination of High Tide Line and No-Development Zone.

The petitioners, four individuals, purchased a piece of land adjacent to the seacoast in Goa and sought to construct structures. They obtained approva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings for Specific Performance. Concurrent findings of fact under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 cannot be interfered with in second appeal as no substantial question of law arose.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, instituted Special Civil Suit No.72 of 2014 seeking possession of suit lands. They claimed that vide two agreements dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Oral Agreement for Sale of Agricultural Land Not Proved; Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.73 of 2007 for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of 1.01 HR la...