Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1983 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1983 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Execution of Decrees Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact by Cooperative Courts. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution, it cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed in execution proceedings und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petition in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 with Concurrent Findings of Fact. The court held that findings of fact recorded by courts below were not perverse or erroneous and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the court...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Non-Payment of Rent. Concurrent findings of fact under Section 12(3)(b) of Bombay Rent Act, 1947 upheld as tenant failed to deposit arrears of rent since 30.04.19.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Lotan Tryambak Khairnar, was a tenant in the suit premises at a monthly rent of Rs. 9.45 ps. The respondents, original plaintiffs, fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Properties under SAFEMA. Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Validly Triggers SAFEMA Proceedings Despite Non-Execution of Detention and Redemption of Confiscated Currency.

27 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Smt. Yamini S. Bhagwanji, challenged the forfeiture of three immovable properties and certain bank accounts under the Smugglers and Fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court which con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court held that no substantial question of law arose as the appellant failed to prove exclusive title and the courts below correctly found the property to be ancestral joint family property.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by Manohar Sampat Bavaskar (original defendant no.1) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Ja...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Panchayat Demolition Order — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Concurrent Findings of Unauthorized Construction. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the Panchayat and Appellate Authority that the construction was unauthorized under the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, and refused to interfere under Article 227.

9 Oct 2018

The petitioners, three companies registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged an order dated 17/06/2015 passed by the Appellate Authority and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Defendant's Possession and Readiness to Perform Not Proved. Court sets aside concurrent findings of courts below, holding that plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

5 Feb 2019

The present second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The appellant (original defendant) ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession. Reservation of land for Octroi Naka was withdrawn in 1975, and the Municipal Council failed to prove any subsisting right over the suit property.

28 Feb 2019

The present second appeal was filed by the Municipal Council, Amalner, challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Defendant's Possession and Readiness to Perform Established. Court sets aside concurrent findings of courts below, holding that plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

5 Feb 2019

The appellant, original defendant Waman s/o Jema Jadhav, challenged the concurrent judgments of the trial court and first appellate court decreeing sp...

57 58 59 60 61

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)