Search Results for "closure not business closure"

641 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 641 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case for Handwriting Expert Opinion. Accused entitled to send disputed cheque for expert opinion to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Dada Ghanshyam Pathak, was the original accused in STCC No.1489/2006 filed by respondent No.2, Minabai Kishor Patil, under Section 138...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Part in Recovery of Possession Case — Appellant Not a Tenant, No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The appellate court's order granting entire damages without separate inquiry under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC set aside, trial court's direction for inquiry restored.

The appellant, Rajendra Suryakant More, was a former employee of the respondent company, M/s Fixolite Wires & Cables Pvt. Ltd. He was provided with a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR in GCA TV Subsidy Misappropriation Case Due to Lack of New Material and Abuse of Process. Second FIR for part of same amount already covered in first FIR is not maintainable under Section 482 CrPC and Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Dayanand G. Narvekar, was the President of the Goa Cricket Association (GCA) during 2006-2007. The Board of Control for Cricket in Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Car Parking License Dispute. Clause 15 of License Agreement Permitted Change of Location Without Compensation, and No Evidence of Loss Was Found.

The petitioner, Garuda Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd., was granted a license by the Airport Authority of India (AAI) to operate a car parking facility at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Restaurant's Challenge to Closing Hours Under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. Petitioner's Request for Exemption from Section 19(1) Timings Rejected as State Government Lacks Power to Grant Individual Exemptions Beyond Schedule II.

The petitioner, Sardar Refreshments, a restaurant, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the State of Maharashtra to grant it an exemption ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Explosives License Cancellation and Police Action Against Fireworks Traders. Court Holds That Natural Justice Violation Is Outweighed by Public Safety Concerns Under Explosives Act, 1884 and Section 144 CrPC.

The petitioners, ten firms and individuals engaged in the sale of fireworks and explosives in Sultanpet, Bangalore, challenged the cancellation of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Auto Rickshaw Unions' Challenge to Mandatory Electronic Digital Fare Meter Fitment in Larger Consumer Interest. Notification under Rule 137 of Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Upheld as Valid Exercise of State's Legislative Competence Despite Petitioners' Hardship Claims.

The Bombay High Court heard and dismissed two writ petitions challenging a State Government notification making electronic digital fare meters mandato...