Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act"

843 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 843 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for CIDCO Project, Upholds Validity of Acquisition Under 2013 Act. Court holds that acquisition under the 1894 Act had lapsed but was validly revived under the 2013 Act, and that the Court Receiver was not in possession at the time of taking over.

The case involves three writ petitions concerning the acquisition of land bearing survey no. 59/8 at Village Asudgaon, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes CIDCO Stop-Work Notice in 12.5% Scheme Plot Dispute. Petitioner's Title from Original Owner Upheld Over Trust Claim Under Section 11 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Deepak Valji Karia and M/s. Ambedeep Enterprises, challenged a stop-work notice dated 6 May 2016 issued by CIDCO (Respondent Nos. 2-4)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Termination of Lease by MIDC for Non-Use Due to Fire Accident. Lease of 99 Years Cannot Be Terminated Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing and Considering Force Majeure Event.

The petitioners, Vidyut Metallics Ltd. and another, challenged an order dated 28.07.2015 passed by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Framing of Charges in Multiple Cases. Court holds that at the stage of framing charges, only a prima facie case is required and not a detailed evaluation of evidence.

The judgment involves a batch of criminal revision petitions filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MIDC Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement — No Basis to Treat Land as Irrigated. Reference Court Enhancement from Rs.15,000 to Rs.30,000 per Hectare for Dry Crop Land Upheld.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against the enhancement of compensation for land acquisition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...