Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1042 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1042 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation by MHADA in Redevelopment Project. Court Holds That Cancellation Before Opening of Price Bids Is Not Arbitrary When Done in Public Interest and for Valid Reasons.

The petitioners, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Private Limited and its director, challenged the cancellation of an e-tender issued by the Maharashtra H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows State and Claimant Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 30 per sq.m. with 30% Deduction for Development. Court applies belting method and deducts development cost for large land parcel acquired for Nhava-Sheva water supply.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same award dated 30th September 1989 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.

The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Section 13(1) 120-Day Period Not Mandatory for Owner's Proposal. Owner's Preferential Right to Develop Slum Land Not Extinguished by Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.

The case involves a challenge to an order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) dated 17th February, 2023, which rejected a redevelopment p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Bank CEO Appointment Dispute — Upholds Apex Society's Power to Depute Cadre Officers. Section 54(3) of Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 obligates District Central Cooperative Bank to accept CEO deputed by State Cooperative Bank from its cadre.

The dispute arose from the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the first respondent, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, a District C...