Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Order of District Deputy Registrar Under Section 154A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. The court held that the District Deputy Registrar lacked jurisdiction to pass an order directing possession under Section 154A, and that the order was passed without hearing the society, violating natural justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Pran Ashish Cooperative Housing Society Limited, a registered cooperative society under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 June 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mumbai City (3) and Competent Authority (Respondent No.1). The impugned order was passed under Section 154A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, directing the Petitioner to hand over possession of the society's premises to Respondent No.2, Tarun Shah, who claimed to be a member of the society. The Petitioner contended that the order was passed without jurisdiction, without affording any opportunity of hearing, and in violation of principles of natural justice. The Petitioner argued that Section 154A does not empower the District Deputy Registrar to adjudicate disputes relating to possession or title between the society and its members, and that such disputes fall within the purview of the Cooperative Court under Section 91 of the Act. The Respondents, including Tarun Shah and other members, opposed the petition, arguing that the Petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 152 of the Act by way of appeal or revision, and that the petition was not maintainable. The High Court, after hearing the parties, held that the impugned order was patently without jurisdiction as Section 154A does not confer power to decide possession disputes. The court further held that the order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice as no notice or hearing was given to the Petitioner. The court also held that the availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the exercise of writ jurisdiction where the order is without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice. Accordingly, the court allowed the petition, quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 30 June 2025, and directed the District Deputy Registrar to decide the matter afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Jurisdiction of District Deputy Registrar - Section 154A Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The District Deputy Registrar acted without jurisdiction in passing an order under Section 154A directing the society to hand over possession to a member, as the provision does not confer power to adjudicate title or possession disputes between society and its members. Held that the order was patently without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice. (Paras 1-29)

B) Constitutional Law - Maintainability of Writ Petition - Article 226 of Constitution of India - Alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the exercise of writ jurisdiction where the order is patently without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice. Held that the petition was maintainable despite availability of alternative remedy under Section 152 of the Act. (Paras 1-29)

C) Cooperative Law - Natural Justice - Section 154A Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The impugned order was passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner society, violating principles of natural justice. Held that the order was liable to be set aside on this ground alone. (Paras 1-29)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 30 June 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar under Section 154A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, directing the Petitioner to hand over possession of the society's premises to Respondent No.2, is sustainable in law and whether the petition under Article 226 is maintainable despite availability of alternative remedy.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 30 June 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, and directed the District Deputy Registrar to decide the matter afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • jurisdiction of District Deputy Registrar
  • Section 154A Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • maintainability of petition under Article 226
  • alternative remedy not an absolute bar
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 58

Writ Petition (L) No. 32903 of 2025

2026-07-14

N. J. Jamadar, J.

Mr. Aspi Chinoy, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Simil Purohit, Senior Advocate, Mr. Vishal Pattabiraman, Mr. Rutwij Bapat, Ms. Nikita Vardhan and Ms. Nidhi Pathak, i/b Kanga & Co, for the Petitioner. Mr. Manish Upadhye, AGP, for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Somnath Anchan, Mr. Suraj Iyer and Mr. Atharva Utekar, i/b Ganesh and Co, for Respondent No.2. Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, with Aniesh Jadhav, i/b TRD Associates, for Respondent Nos. 3 to 8.

Pran Ashish Cooperative Housing Society Limited

District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mumbai City (3) and Competent Authority; Tarun Shah; Dipika Shah; Apurva Shah; Dhara Mehul Desai; Nayana Himanshu Shah; Nihar Himanshu Shah; Shivali Himanshu Shah; The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the District Deputy Registrar under Section 154A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

Remedy Sought

The Petitioner sought quashing of the impugned order dated 30 June 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar directing the Petitioner to hand over possession of the society's premises to Respondent No.2.

Filing Reason

The Petitioner contended that the impugned order was passed without jurisdiction, without affording any opportunity of hearing, and in violation of principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the District Deputy Registrar had jurisdiction under Section 154A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 to pass an order directing the society to hand over possession to a member. Whether the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice. Whether the writ petition is maintainable despite the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 152 of the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that Section 154A does not confer power to adjudicate possession disputes; such disputes fall under Section 91 of the Act before the Cooperative Court. The order was passed without notice or hearing, violating natural justice. Respondents argued that the Petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 152 by way of appeal or revision, and the petition should not be entertained. They also supported the impugned order on merits.

Ratio Decidendi

The District Deputy Registrar lacked jurisdiction under Section 154A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 to pass an order directing possession of the society's premises to a member, as the provision does not empower such adjudication. The order was also passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice. The availability of an alternative remedy does not bar the exercise of writ jurisdiction where the order is patently without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order is patently without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice. The availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the exercise of writ jurisdiction.

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging an order dated 30 June 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mumbai City (3) and Competent Authority. The petition was reserved on 1 July 2026 and pronounced on 14 July 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 154A, Section 152, Section 91
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Secretary's Order Restricting Construction on Triangular Property for Traffic Safety Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act. The Court held that the Secretary's order under Section 178(2) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, proh...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Order of District Deputy Registrar Under Section 154A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Lack of ...