Search Results for "Industrial Court discretion"

1609 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1609 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declares Payments Made by Company in Liquidation Void Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 and Orders Refund. Payments made after winding up order to caterer without court approval are void, and the caterer must repay with interest.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. GOL Offshore Limited (in liquidation) filed OLR No. 139 of 2018 under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case for Notified Person Under Special Court Act. Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of Income Tax Act, 1961 not chargeable due to assets being vested in Custodian.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which held that the assessee, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Conductor Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Petitioner Failed to Establish Strong Prima Facie Case for Reinstatement Pending Final Adjudication of Dismissal for Misappropriation of Funds.

The petitioner, Subhash Gulabchand Pawar, was employed as a Conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since January 2006...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Remand Order by Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Section 7(8) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Power to Remand; Appellate Authority Must Decide Appeal on Merits.

The petitioner, Dr. Gajanan Vithoba Jain, a former employee of the respondent-management running Shiv Vaibhav College of Education, Wardha, filed an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Restraining Transfer of Employees in Print Media Company. Transfer of Senior Printers to Other Locations Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, The Indian Express (P) Limited and its two officers, challenged an order dated 28 November 2022 passed by the learned Member, Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Implement Award and Settlement Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Tata Yazaki Autocomp Ltd., a company manufacturing wire harness for the automobile sector employing around 500 permanent workmen in Pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Notifications Issued in 2005 Filed in 2019 Held Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Sri B R Srinivas, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at B...